H7J9YRAL
type: UserItem
resource: Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on pulmonary nodule detection and localization in chest CT: a comparative study among radiologists of varying experience levels
tagged: UserTag
  label: *Artificial Intelligence
tagged: UserTag
  label: *Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
tagged: UserTag
  label: *Radiologists
tagged: UserTag
  label: *Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging
tagged: UserTag
  label: *Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
tagged: UserTag
  label: Adult
tagged: UserTag
  label: Aged
tagged: UserTag
  label: Ct
tagged: UserTag
  label: Female
tagged: UserTag
  label: Humans
tagged: UserTag
  label: Lung cancer
tagged: UserTag
  label: Male
tagged: UserTag
  label: Middle Aged
tagged: UserTag
  label: Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging
tagged: UserTag
  label: Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
tagged: UserTag
  label: Radiologists
tagged: UserTag
  label: Software

Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on pulmonary nodule detection and localization in chest CT: a comparative study among radiologists of varying experience levels
type: AcademicArticle
abstract: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of AI assistance on pulmonary nodule detection rates among radiology residents and senior radiologists, along with assessing the effectiveness of two different commercialy available AI software systems in improving detection rates and LungRADS classification in chest CT. The study cohort included 198 participants with 221 pulmonary nodules. Residents' mean detection rate increased significantly from 64 to 77% with AI assist, while seniors' detection rate remained largely unchanged (85% vs. 86%). Residents showed significant improvement in segmental nodule localization with AI assistance, seniors did not. Software 2 slightly outperformed software 1 in increasing detection rates (67-77% vs. 80-86%), but neither significantly affected LungRADS classification. The study suggests that clinical experience mitigates the need for additional AI software, with the combination of CAD with residents being the most beneficial approach. Both software systems performed similarly, with software 2 showing a slightly higher but non-significant increase in detection rates.
pages: 22447
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73435-3
source: 39341945
creator: Person
author list: Person
is part of: Issue
  date: 2024-09-29
  volume: 14
  issue: 1
  is part of: Sci Rep
    type: Journal
    issn: 2045-2322 (Electronic) 2045-2322 (Linking)

Person
given name: A. A.
surname: Peters

Person
given name: N.
surname: Wiescholek

Person
given name: M.
surname: Muller

Person
given name: J.
surname: Klaus

Person
given name: F.
surname: Strodka

Person
given name: A.
surname: Macek

Person
given name: E.
surname: Primetis

Person
given name: D.
surname: Drakopulos

Person
given name: A. T.
surname: Huber

Person
given name: V. C.
surname: Obmann

Person
given name: T. D.
surname: Ruder

Person
given name: J. E.
surname: Roos

Person
given name: J. T.
surname: Heverhagen

Person
given name: A.
surname: Christe

Person
given name: L.
surname: Ebner